It seems that each day brings worse and worse news about the economy, but this crisis of capitalism may just be an opportunity we need for solving a number of ongoing social problems, including racial inequality (image source). In a recent post for the Huffington Post, former Senator Gary Hart suggests that the current financial disaster along with “a weakened Wall Street and a chastened conservative community” provides a unique opportunity for the next president to transform the U.S. economy and a “sober re-regulation of markets.” Hart is insightful here when he writes:
But recreation of another Rooseveltian period of 1932 to 1940, with a new set of rules for intricate financial institutions, is not enough. We must transform our economy from one of consumption to one of production, invest much more heavily in new technologies, research, and invention, and start the process of creating a post-carbon economy. The current wreckage must not simply be put back together to recreate the old economy. It must be pushed out of the way to make space for a new, 21st century economy.
The same may be said for foreign policy. Merely returning to the pre-Bush status quo will not work because the new century features a host of new realities: proliferation of weapons of mass destruction; the rise of stateless nations; the threat of pandemics; failed and failing states; mass south-north migrations; climate change; globalized economics; and the list continues. An Obama administration will have responsibility for repairing damaged traditional relations. But it will also have the opportunity to create a new round of international institution-building that includes international financial regulation and cooperation, international administration of a post-Kyoto treaty, reduction in nuclear weapons, integration of public health services, and so on. Our new foreign policy should be patterned on the immensely creative 1945 to 1948 Truman era.
And when troops and equipment are returned from Iraq and Afghanistan, our military should not merely be “re-set”, the Washington code word for rebuilding the Cold War military. Our defenses in the new century must acknowledge the transformation of war and the changing nature of conflict which will require new military structures, command and control systems, and even weapons themselves.
I heartily agree with this assessment and am disappointed that there’s not more of this kind of rhetoric coming from the Obama campaign (but, I get the political reality of just-getting-elected). I’d also suggest that Hart doesn’t go far enough. While the national and international leaders are trying to figure out how to clean up the detritus from the party of greed and excess that the capitalists threw for themselves, this is a moment of great possibility for thinking in new ways about old problems. Some months ago, I wrote here about racism, suburban sprawl and what it might be like to imagine a green future. The disaster in the financial markets is, in many ways, deeply tied to the idea of suburban sprawl and the “American lifestyle” which is doomed. And, now that ultimately unworkable style of living is, to hear some tell it, unraveling. I don’t disagree. And, added to that noxious mix of an economic boom squandered is one of the oldest problems in the U.S.: racial inequality interwoven with economic disparities. The combination of these two systems of oppression create all sorts of other havoc in people’s lives.
Yet, even as all the forecasts for the U.S. economy look dour, I’m feeling uncharacteristically… well, not officially optimistic…. but at least mildly hopeful. It seems to me that there’s kind of a perfect storm of bad, even cataclysmic, events happening at once that just make real change possible.
Perhaps, just perhaps, this is the moment where people get together and force their leaders to make real changes – as Hart suggests – in shifting away from a carbon-based economy to one that’s based on clean energy. Perhaps people will get together and force their leaders to invest in education, green jobs, and re-builing the infrastructure, rather than in foreign wars to support our dependence on oil. Perhaps, just perhaps, this is the moment that people can get together and demand more reform like the Green Jobs Act of 2007, which will make $120 million a year available across the country to begin training workers (and would-be workers) for jobs in the clean energy sector. Van Jones describes the benefits of this best when he writes:
At their best, green-collar jobs offer living wages and upward mobility — in growth industries. And most of these jobs simply cannot be outsourced to other countries. The reason is simple: the solar panels and wind farms must be constructed here in the United States, not overseas. And the millions and millions of buildings that need to be retrofitted to save more energy cannot be shipped over to China. They all must be weatherized where they stand — right here in the United States.
Therefore, green-collar jobs can provide secure employment for U.S. workers.
The key is to make sure that those people who most need the jobs — urban youth, returning veterans, struggling farmers, displaced workers from our manufacturing sectors — can get all the training they need to fill those posts.
The allocation for this ($120 million) now seems like a tiny amount now (compared to the $700 billion devoted to the economic bailout of Wall Street), but this kind of innovative thinking may just be one of the pathways out of the current mess. And, if we could ensure that these kinds of programs actually helped those most in need of jobs, it might go a long way to ameliorating economic and racial inequality. Unfortunately, neither of the presidential candidates is suggesting anything quite this innovative. The fact is the people will have to lead on this, and that is long overdue.
CNN is doing a series on the “ten most wanted,” ten of the powerful white men who gave use us the economic crisis. Only they do not point out they are white men…. http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/category/culprits-of-the-collapse/
Yeah, I saw part of that with Fuld. He shows a remarkable lack of insight into his own behavior. He’s the one that got punched out on a treadmill recently. I wonder what would happen if the mainstream media started pointing out the race/class/gender position of these “culprits”?
Why do you link capitalism with racism and inequality?
Racism exists under every form of government, and so does inequality.
Do you think that there was no racism in the former Soviet Union, or China today etc?
Minorities were horribly treated by the Soviet government, subject to mass deportation, brutality and slaughter.
In the far Northwest of China today, Xinjiang province, or East turkestan as the indigenous
people there call it, the Uighurs,
Turkish-speaking muslims with caucasian features, are subject to
brutal treatment, sent to labor camps, executed summarily, etc.
Beijing has settled many ethnic Chinese there, and many of them are as hoistile to the Uighurs as
some whites in America have been. They call them dirty and stupid, even though they have a rich culture and are renowned through Central Asia and elsewhere are poets, musicians, scholars and statesmen.
The Turkish language was brought from this region about a thousand years ago to what is now Turkey and Iran by people from this region.
And if capitalism is such a bad
thing, has any one ever come up with anything better?
The economic system set up by Lenin and Stalin etc was the most inept,inefficient and corrupt ever devised. There was mass poverty except for a few party bigwigs who had all sorts of priveleges denied to most USSR citizens.
A recent book about gullible Americans who moved to the Soviet Union in the 30s thinking it was a “worker’s Paradise”
describes a sumptuous banquet for
Stalin and guests filled with gourmet delicacies while millions in that country were starving.
RB, white racism–in the accurate meaning of whites’ racial oppression–and modern capitalism grew up together in the European colonial and imperialist eras from the 1500s to the 1900s. Without the extensive and racialized oppression of Native Americans and African Americans, there likely would not have been great wealth for Europeans in this era, which was (and still is) the basis for the growth of modern capitalism. Modern capitalism prospered off the land, labor, and bodies of many peoples of color. A bloody process.
Robert good to read you here, thanks for dropping a comment. Joe is right, there’s a strong link – and a lot of scholarship – that connects the growth of modern (global) capitalism with the rise of white racism. And, I think that particularly here in the U.S., these are interwoven in pretty profound ways. Of course, re-working capitalism (or even the advent of socialism) is certainly no guarantee of greater racial equality, but it is an opportunity to re-think the structures that are in place.