Targeting Latino Children is Not the Answer

A recent article published in the New York Times by Kirk Semple reports that federal officials have had to send a memo to various states and school districts informing them that asking for citizenship status before enrolling children is illegal. It seems not only are many school districts (139 in New York State alone) are asking for documentation of students, but certain states such as Oklahoma are considering state bills requiring it. This should not surprise us considering the fact that Congress could not pass the Dream Act, that we have witnessed record number of deportations in recent years which have separated families and placed children in the foster-care maze, and that states have passed discriminatory laws like Arizona’s SB1070. These examples all point to a dark shadow side of America, this land of immigrants.

Xenophobia is nothing new in America, especially during economic hard times. Politicians and other civic leaders historically have succeeded in redirecting the public’s attention to symbolic policy issues that target the most vulnerable, the voiceless, and those who are marginalized. To an American of Asian, African, Middle Eastern, Jewish, Irish, or Southern or Eastern European ancestry, this isn’t news. Immigrants from these groups know all too well what it is like to be needed for one’s labor, but despised for one’s presence. We’ve been down this road before. Recall the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act and the Gentlemen’s Agreement of 1907, halting new Japanese immigration in exchange for non-discrimination against those of Japanese descent already in the U.S., as examples of racist immigration practices in America’s past. Arizona’s SB1070 is not unique in our history. What is different now is that this treatment is now being directed to children too.

The current immigration debate focusing on Latinos is no different from our past. Whether one is a proponent of earned citizenship through some time of amnesty, tougher border enforcement either by building fences or militarizing the border, a proponent of another guest worker program, or is engaged in the on-going debate about whether immigrants cost or benefit society, Latinos in America are experiencing prejudice, discrimination, cruelty and mistreatment from this latest round of scapegoating. The bottom line is that the 50 million Latinos in this country—16.3 percent of the population according to a new Pew Hispanic Report, are not accepted or seen as real Americans, regardless of our legal or professional status as discussed in a forthcoming book on Latino professionals. The current debate on immigration underscores this fact.

People need to remember some fundamental American values, such as the Golden Rule and what it means to walk in the footsteps of another. If we can honestly put ourselves in immigrants shoes, we may see that most of us would make the same decisions that undocumented workers have made. Regardless of the law, we would make the sacrifices necessary to do the best we can for our families. For example, try to sincerely imagine living in an agricultural community that, since the passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement, has suffered tremendous financial hardship. Local corn, grown there for generations, can no longer compete against the corn imports from the United States, which are heavily subsidized by the U.S. government. To clothe your children, your wife has taken to sewing their underwear out of old flour sacks. Your children lack shoes. Your family eats little protein, maybe once a week. Meals mostly consist of “chicken” soup, without the chicken — a watery broth of tortillas or rice and beans. The only hope seems to be to go work in the U.S. While it breaks your heart to leave your children behind, knowing your youngest may not even remember who you are upon your return and knowing your older ones need you to learn life’s lessons, you make the only rational decision a family-centered person can. You give up everything and join the countless numbers of people who have left their communities empty of working-aged men.

Not many of us could sit back and watch our children or elderly parents suffer hunger and destitution without doing something to ease their suffering and improve their lives. Missing from so much of the immigration debate is the humanity of the undocumented immigrants who are making sacrifices such as being separated from their children often for years, or being away and unable to return if a parent dies. These are sacrifices most of us cannot even imagine.

It is only through an understanding of the complex circumstances that lead people to migrate that we can create a much-needed constructive, humane, realistic, and just immigration policy. Blaming undocumented immigrants is not the answer. As Michele Wucker states in her book Lockout, “The population of immigrants who are in this country without legal papers did not grow to more than 10 million people without America’s full participation in the legal charade.”

Instead of focusing on the unjust immigration laws, politicians, political pundits, and anti-immigrant advocates have hypocritically taken the stance that undocumented workers are “lawbreakers” who need to learn to “follow the rules” and “do it the right way.”

They should take note that laws can be, and are often, wrong. When half the American population could not vote until 1920, were women wrong to demand the law changed?

Instead of hiding behind the façade of law, we should remember the humanity of undocumented immigrants. We all lose when we discriminate against one another. We are a better country than to require children to prove residency status in order for them to go to school. Targeting children is not the answer.


  1. hames

    now is a particularly important time to focus on educating our populace. what can be done about the targeting of latinos, limiting educational opportunities for undocumented children?

  2. Blaque Swan, previously No1KState

    Here’s the sad truth: the first president of color, born to a white women in Hawaii had to publicize both his short form and long form birth certificate to prove he was born a natural US citizen.

    No, we’re not a better country than to target children.

    . . . That we think we are is part of the problem. We give ourselves permission to do inhumane things to people, including children, because, to borrow a phrase, if we do it, then it’s good.

    The xenophobia that’s been targeted at adults, “illegals,” has been bad enough. Opposition to the Dream Act has been mystifying. I thought we couldn’t go any lower than Arizona’s “show your papers” law. But alas . . .

    . . .

    What happened to all those jobs that went to Mexico? Anybody else remember all those complaints about jobs going to Mexico?

    And why don’t these farmers give up their subsidies and compete on the market? Isn’t that what they say America is about? Some of these farms are owned by industries that force workers to compete on the global market, right? What’s good for the goose is good for the gander, right? I mean, I thought welfare was a bad thing, right?

    Aren’t these people who would target children for documentation the same ones who argue that the US was founded as a Christian nation? Who do everything they can to prevent abortion because life is so precious?

    I’m reminded of two quotes:

    Soame Jenyns – “If Christian nations were nations of Christians, there’d be no wars.”

    Jesus Christ – “Suffer little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God.

    I’m sorry for rambling. Things like this . . . The hypocrisy is sickening. The inability of some to walk in another’s shoes, as though people risk their lives to cross the border just so they can stick it to America, is disheartening.

    But help me Lord, I feel sorry for those people, too.

    It’s just a bad deal all the way around. The sad thing is that anti-immigrants are fighting the wrong people. And it’s keeping us from addressing the real issue and the true criminals, for lack of a better word.

  3. Maria

    Unfortunately, until some representing a child who has been harmed by this civil rights violation steps forward and an court order is in place it isn’t going to stop.

    But who is going to be brave enough to go forward to stop it—certainly not a child who is undocumented? I think it has to be a child who is a citizen who is questioned that has to step forward. Because just like in AZ in my view, asking of the question in and of itself is a civil rights violation. But unfortunately, it is for courts to determine because teachers are state actors—policy isn’t policy until the street level bureaucrats decide how it will be implemented. So, if teachers, police, and other “state actors” decide to implement policy unjustly it won’t change without a court challenge.

    So, I agree. We’re not a Christian nation, we’re a legal nation. Only our laws apply differently to people of different races, nationalities, and religions.

  4. Maria

    Yes, absolutely, most teachers are good people. My understanding from the article is that asking children for papers before allowing them to register for school is more of a district-wide decision. This is why Prop. 187 had a lot of resistance from teachers (and nurses). They didn’t want to become immigration enforcers. That isn’t what they signed up for. On the other hand, if teachers are participating in this it is in my opinion, a civil rights violation.

Leave a Reply