Anna grew up the youngest daughter in of Mexican immigrants who earned a meager living as farmer workers in Burley, Idaho. Who would have imagined she would become a successful attorney in a city like Seattle? Who would have imagined she would win the 2009 King County Bar Association’s Pro Bono award—an award usually reserved for attorneys from the big firms, not for lawyers in solo practice who devote themselves to the area of labor law helping undocumented workers collect wages they are owed? Who would have imagined she would unexpectedly become the legal guardian and new mom of her niece’s three- year-old son because her niece was shot and killed by her husband and the father is in jail?
As Anna recalls the experiences that motivated her to go to law school, she notes they weren’t all pleasant. Her reasons stemmed mostly from witnessing her parent’s being treated terribly. She hated that they weren’t treated fairly when they worked in the fields, whether it was in the sugar beets, the beans, or in the potato fields. Remembering the conditions in the fields made her cry, particularly when she described having to take their own toilet paper because they didn’t have bathrooms, or when the ranchers would give them unfair and illegal rules such as only allowing them fifteen minute lunch breaks. What was worse, she stressed, was that her parent’s would be even stricter by imposing only a ten-minute lunch on her and her family so that the rancher wouldn’t get mad at them for taking lunch at all. Her dad was always particularly cautious when it came to the ranchers or bosses because he didn’t have any power or rights. And that lack of power for her dad is what made her want to go on to law school.
As an undergraduate she told her advising professor that she was interested in going to law school. Her professor told her flat out that she didn’t have what it takes to be a lawyer. Of course, as a Latina from her socio-economic and racialized background, she had heard this kind of “advice” from her teachers before. While it made her angry, she didn’t internalize it. She had stopped doing this a long time ago. Instead she told herself that this political science professor didn’t know what he was talking about. After all, he wasn’t a lawyer. When she was offered an opportunity to attend Gonzaga University’s Summer Pre-law program and her life took off. It was at Gonzaga that she met other Latinas from different regions of the country, all from farm worker backgrounds and they understood each other. They knew the same Mexican musicians, they could speak Spanish, they shared many of the same experiences (including many of the same reasons for wanting to go to law school), they understood the same jokes, and they were all Latinas who were driven and ambitious and wanted to succeed. For the first time in her life, Anna felt comfortable and at peace with others from her culture who were also ambitious and driven.
However it wasn’t easy. Her first year in law school was a difficult one. She was going through a divorce from a very controlling husband. She was having a lot of health problems from all the stress. In addition, there were family obligations and pressures to contend with during that crucial first year of law school: her oldest brother got into trouble with the law, her other brother became seriously ill with diabetes, her youngest brother’s family life was falling apart, and her mother had to return to Mexico because her aunt had passed away. So she was dealing with all these family pressures and problems and went to the Dean of the law school to see what would happen if she would just drop out that year. When the Dean told her that if she quit, she would not be guaranteed a spot the following year. At the time the doctors weren’t sure of her medical diagnosis, so they couldn’t postpone her final exams on medical grounds, and she knew she would just get further and further behind. She either had to finish the year or quit law school altogether. She decided to make it through her first year final examinations. She recalls that during one final examination she actually just put her head down and started to write her exam and to cry. She wrote the whole exam with her head on her desk while crying. Somehow she passed it. Somehow she passed all her exams that year and she made it through her first year of law school when at times getting to class was all she could handle.
After earning her law degree she returned to Idaho to try to help farm workers, but in many ways she felt she was in a straight jacket. Due to the systemic institutional racism that farm workers lived under, she felt as if all she could do was say, “I can’t help you” in Spanish. She described the story of people coming to her telling her that a brother was in Mexico because the rancher called immigration to avoid paying him, but since the brother was no longer in the country, she couldn’t collect his wages for him. She recalled another example of being powerless to help when a farm worker was injured on the job, because farm workers couldn’t receive workers compensation since farm work was exempt from workers compensation at that time. Frustrated and ready to leave Idaho behind, she was offered a position at the Northwest Justice Project in Seattle and took it. Now in solo practice, she has been practicing law in Seattle ever since.
Although far removed from the suffering she and her family experienced as farm workers, and far removed from many of the obstacles she had to overcome to attend and complete law school, Anna’s story is the story of many Latinos who must balance their lives in American culture by doing what is necessary to succeed, while at the same time, trying not to let the process of success change them in ways that are antithetical to traditional Latino culture and values. Her story highlights that for many first generation Latino professionals, the Latino culture is critical for survival and for success, it is the foundation and the motivation for all that they do. However, it also shows that because Latinos as a group are situated in a disadvantaged position in society, Latino professionals are never too far from the pain and dysfunction found in their communities of origin. It seems there is always a crisis when you come from a poor immigrant family without many rights in society.
Often the economic pressures, the cultural expectations of being available to the family (no matter what the situation may be), the fear of the unknown—many times from the parents’ negative experiences in a racist and unkind society, and the need to become too individualistic or too “Americanized,” make it extremely difficult for Latino professionals. In Latino culture one’s family comes first. La familia is one of the most noble and honored priorities of the culture.
Anna’s story of growing up in a farm worker immigrant household in Idaho to becoming such a successful attorney that won the King County Bar Association’s Pro Bono Award, to raising her niece’s three year old son as her own son demonstrates that if you don’t give up, if you are there for the family, if you fight the good fight, then you can become a great success. But it isn’t easy. You have to be strong enough to resist the stereotyping, the questioning, and the racialization you encounter in your new professional role. And at the same time, you have to be available to drop everything you are doing and help out your family or it can be seen as an act of betrayal to your family that you’re not there for them. This is a lot to balance. However, as Anna looks back on her life now, she realizes that part of her is and will always be drawn back to her roots, to her family, and to her culture. She hopes she can instill this cultural strength in her new son as her parents did for her, because in the end her culture is what helped her persevere.
Anna’s story is reflective of many of the stories I heard from the Latinos I interviewed. Her experiences demonstrate not only the white discrimination and opposition her and her family encountered over and over again, but her story is also reflective of the many strategies of resistance Latinos use to confront the racial, class, and gender oppression they experience. Chou and Feagin observe that “among all groups of color, only African Americans have managed to create a strong counterframe and to teach it to successive generations” Yet they discovered in their study of Asian Americans, that communities of color such as Asians are displaying acts of resistance even if they are not direct. Similarly, the Latino respondents in this study are also actively resisting the negative framing of who they are. Often the strategies of resistance to the openly anti-Latino climate in America begin at home. Like Anna’s parents, most of the Latinos in this study came from families who wanted them to lay low and not to make waves. Why: because as an immigrant family, one doesn’t make waves or draw attention to themselves. However, one thing many of the parents insisted upon was that that the respondents learn and speak Spanish at home. Speaking Spanish become a way for them to maintain some sort of semblance of dignity when everything around them told them that they were inferior.
Professor Ron Schmidt understands this well when he writes, “Despite the controversy surrounding English-only debates, the importance of language, identity, and culture go hand-in-hand.” Professor Schmidt argues that language is central to one’s identity; to attack it is to attack the person. He states, “[I]f language, for example, becomes an important marker of ethnic identity, then language policy represents one avenue through which to gain greater public recognition and respect for a particular ethnic community” (p. 53).He is absolutely right. Nearly half of the Latino respondents in this study spoke Spanish as a first language and over thirty percent indicated that they currently speak both English and Spanish within both their family settings and social occasions.
Language and cultural maintenance become heroic acts of resistance on the part of immigrants and their children who often have so few rights.
~ This post is an excerpt from a book manuscript by Dr. Mária Chávez, Assistant Professor, Pacific Lutheran University
This is a great post. I’m glad work is being done on the racism in the Pacific Northwest, which is all too often invisible.
I only wanted to add a couple of personal thoughts to accent the main post. While Washington and Idaho like to think they are completely different and even opposite in virtually every respect, they are more similar than different. While Anna’s story is most awesome, the same exact exploitation she grew up with is going on in Washington–Central-Eastern Washington and has been also. With this in mind, what stood out for me in this post, from growing up with the colorblind racism and pointing fingers at Idaho as “those are the folks who are the ‘real’ racists”, etc., (i.e., Hayden Lake, Richard Butler, Aryan Nations, etc.) and Washington is the antithesis of Idaho, etc., the presentation of Anna’s story saddened me a bit. For me reading this, it’s like she was raised in this highly racist horrible Idaho, then Washington State was her saving grace by way of attending a highly respectable law school and then becoming an attorney in Seattle. If Washington State was indeed her saving grace, this is with out a doubt great. But, problematic, is that Washington States severely exploits I have no idea how many in the Latino communities, both documented and undocumented. Her story is a success story for Washington State and Washington loves these stories–it loves them. I hope this makes sense–this is just my own view.
And secondly, Anna’s story is even further important. Unless things have changed in the last decade or so, she had to jump through additional hurdles to practice law in the State of Washington. That is, she had to pass the Washington State Bar exam. If she first practiced law in Idaho and passed that state bar exam, Washington wouldn’t honor it (you have to put your nose very high in the air with the last part of that statement). She would have had to of passed Washington’s exam. I think there are only two other states in the nation that Washington recognizes *nose high in the air* and I can’t remember which one’s at the moment, but coming from most any other state in the nation and having already completed law school and passing a state bar exam elsewhere, practitioners of law would have to take and pass Washington’s exam in order to practice law up there. This is not an easy exam and it is one known for people completing their law degrees and failing, with it being so intimidating the first time around they never go back and make another attempt. People who wish to practice law, either from Washington or elsewhere, get only three tries to pass this exam (if my memory serves me correctly). Again, going on memory, the bar exam is held only once per year in the Tacoma Dome and lasts for three days at 8 hours per day (?)…. My point here is that practicing law in Washington State has high prestige up there…of course the competition is cut throat, but nonetheless, prestigious. Anybody who knows any differently on this or if it has changed in the last several years–please correct.
But with Anna’s story, and the story Maria put up prior with the other Latino attorney, these folks broke through some significant racist and classist/elitist barriers Washington puts up in the legal realm, shall we say. That legal exam is both racist and classist in that it is meant to only allow the best of the best practice law up there–keep people out of the profession and social circles…which is obviously the most privileged and financially and socially advantaged (like white folks)…. With that, I only have to say that they broke through additional barriers that were set up to work against them, which should also be recognized in my own humble opinion.
Other than that–a great post and I look forward to reading the book.
Correction: In the third paragraph–it is meant to only allow certain people to practice, “the best of the best”–de-coded, which is privileged and socially and economically advantaged white folks–racism + classism… I was typing in a hurry and entered in a thought in the middle of a though without correcting the remaining sentence….
The white racial frame requires even new immigrants to be economically advantaged. Well, how are they going to accomplish this if that’s the reason they came to America in the first place? I think they should have a little time to adjust, at least. Get rid of your customs, appearance, entire culture and become a WASP or else face a life time of discrimination? So much for diversity. Ridiculous.