U.N.: U.S. Racial Discrimination Must Be Remedied

 The UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination is meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, and just issued some of its Concluding Observations.   Not long ago, I wrote about Canada skipping the UN conference on racism due to antisemitism.

Yet, despite this  criticism the UN Committee is issuing some charges that should be addressed.   In one of their more scathing conclusions, they charge the U.S. to do more to remedy the effects of racial discrimination in housing, particularly following Hurricane Katrina.  The Committee criticized the discriminatory violations of housing rights of African Americans following Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans. The UN report comes on the heels of a call from two UN experts on housing and minority rights two weeks ago for an immediate halt to the demolitions of public housing in New Orleans.  Many community members argue that these demolitions, along with other reconstruction policies, are preventing African Americans from returning to the city. The UN Committee calls for adequate, affordable housing in Katrina-affected areas, and also for the remedying of housing conditions in racially segregated areas across the country.

Maria Foscarinis, executive director of the National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty (NLCHP), which coordinated a report signed by more than 60 organizations to the Committee detailing the systemic discrimination against racial minorities in equal access to adequate housing, welcomed the Observations:

“Racial discrimination, both overt and subtle, is alive and well in America today. Viewed against international standards — which consider impact, not just intent — the extent of continuing racial discrimination is staggering. The sub-prime mortgage crisis, which also disproportionately impacts minority families, is exacerbating the problem.”

You can download the UN Committee’s Concluding Observations here.


  1. mgs

    I’m just guessing here, but the housing projects in question were probably in the flood ravaged areas of the city. Why should we entice people to come back to live in a death trap? I’m all for low income housing, I just like mine to be above sea level.

  2. Actually, the housing projects in New Orleans were NOT mostly in flood ravaged areas. Most of them were hardly damaged at all, in fact. And what damage there was, the residents had said they would be willing to personally fix up themselves. They could have been re-habbed fairly easily, but the agenda of developers is to tear them down and replace them with “mixed use” housing, which means massive displacement for low-income folks.


  1. The Redstar Perspective » The Gulf Coast in the news today

Leave a Reply